Review and Reaction of the website "The Partnership for 21st Century Skills"
My reaction
My thoughts were confirmed when I clicked on the "Member Organization" link. What I found was a list of what appears to be large financial contributors to the "Partnership for 21st Century Skills". My first impression of the sight being "slick" and commercial was confirmed. The graphic design and layout of this sight is very professional. My thought was "wow! who paid for this web design." Not even considering the content, I knew there had to be major financial backing behind this web page. The fact that Apple Inc. is listed first did not surprise me.
Information on the site that surprised me and helped me develop a new understanding of the issues surrounding 21st-century skills
The partnership seems to focus on what they call the 4Cs: Communication, Creativity, Collaboration, and Critical Thinking. I whole heartedly agree with these ideals. However, I could not shake the feeling of commercialism throughout the site. The blog posts specifically related to special education caught my eye. I was distracted by the fact that there seem to be a bias toward the apple platform. For example in the blog post "What's so Special about 21st Century Learning" The article refers to the teachers macbook being loaded with learning tools. I found this to be too platform specific.This site was not as helpful as the "report" by the same group. The overall understanding from this site and from reading the "report" is not that we need to teach a specific application such as Word or Excel but, that technology as a whole needs to be introduced as a tool. The task is for educator to expose students to technology and build their technological schema.
Information or opinions on the site that I disagree with along with an explanation of why I disagree
I disagree with the philosophy of "focusing on the Core subjects". One of the four main concepts is creativity. I find it ironic that Art is not a valued class. Today when I revisited this site I clicked on the article "5 things you need to know about 21st Century Learning". This article summarizes my point. "There is no end of the unit test on creativity". The article goes on to say :
"98% of children test as creative geniuses at age 5, but that number decreases to only 2% of adults by age 25. Yet, creativity is the engine that drives our world and economy today, not end of course test-taking ability. In fact, these type of multiple-choice, one-right-answer tests undermine the most important reality: There are multiple right answers to most problems. We need to make sure our learners don’t lose that creative spark as they go through school. Otherwise, we risk losing our creative geniuses as well as their innovative ideas and solutions to the biggest problems our world faces."
What class has ALWAYS valued multiple right answers? ART! What class has always valued creativity? ART! What class has always valued innovative ideas and varied solutions? ART! What class does the Partnership for 21st Century Skills want schools to cut? ART! Ironic, right?!
The implications for my students and for me as a contemporary educator
I guess the implication is that I will not have a job. The idea that we need to focus on the "Core" subjects is asinine. What we really have to do is look at classes that have always valued creativity and multiple right answers. We need to introduce our students to different tools that involve technology. We need to build their schema in the area of technology as it relates to all subject areas. We need to teach them that obstacles are not the end of the road but ,simply a problem to be solved. So often if student my students encounter something that they do not expect they shut down and blame the teacher. We need to move our students past the idea that the teacher is responsible for everything. We need to give the the idea that they can solve problems and that they may even have a better idea than the teacher! As Turnipseed states "The answers are not always found in the back of the book".
Note: Stephen Turnipseed wrote the article that I agree with most. I found it very interesting that he was once President of LEGO Education.
Refrences
Bates, R., & Phelan,
K. (2002). Characteristics of a globally competitive workforce. Advances
in Developing Human Resources, 4(2), 121.
Partnership for 21st
Century Skills. (n.d.). A report and mile guide for 21st century skills.
Washington DC: Author. Retrieved fromhttp://www.p21.org/storage/documents/P21_Report.pdf
Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2015). Our Vision and Mission. Washington DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/about-us/our-mission
